@dondattaford5593
About time we grasp the idea that time doesn't exist it's a construct that we use similar to language
@user-xu4ow8wu2q
All it is, is duration and speed of change. Nothing else. That's how we came up with the idea of time: Night and day. One rotation of the planet. Change. We then divided it into what we call 24 hours, Minuets, seconds etc. It's a very convenient tool. But that's it. It is all about change. Gravity can slow or speed up change. We know that because if you're traveling fast in space your clock is going to click slower and even your cells will change/age slower. Same as if you put a clock on top of a mountain and another on or under ground level. So if you're out there for a year according to your clock, the earth may have moved around the sun 3 times. But it all happened at the same time (so to speak) lol... You were gone for 3 years according to us. And you can't go back. But all it was, was differences in the speed of change in different places. We say earth is 4 billion years old. A year is one rotation around the sun. If we rotated faster, we might say the earth is 6 billion years old. It’s just a concept based on earth’s rotations and changes in light and dark and weather. The moon has less gravity, So if you live there your clocks and body will change faster than if you're on earth. But if I call you, we're both talking to each other now. If you live in the west in North America you are 3 hours younger than if you live on the east coast. Really? Obviously not, Same with what we call time dilation. It's change dilation. So yes, it can seem like if you were in space and come back that you went to the future faster, but in reality you didn't. Even Einstein said that time is an illusion, and that both the future and past are unchangeable. So he was asked why he used the word time dilation etc. He said: "In science you need some process to measure anything." So he used the word to mean a measurement of the speed of change. But people don't see it that way. Now imagine if the world did not move. You might live in light or dark or what we call evening or morning. It wouldn't change. So if you had no cell phone or clock etc, how would you feel time? You wouldn't. So as far as I'm concerned there is only an ever changing now. If I'm ever proven wrong, fine. But I highly doubt it. lol..
@alliswell5556
Very good video ❤❤ Love from Maharashtra, India
@frun
Quantum quasiparticles in condensed matter systems can have 1,2 or 3 effective dimensions. And that can explain why we live in 3D. They also can have different speeds (of sound).
@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time
Could the mathematics of Quantum Mechanics represent the physics of time relative to the atoms of the ‘Periodic Table’ with classical physics representing processes over a ‘period of time’ as in Newton's differential equations? Could light photon ∆E=hf energy be continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons, forming our ever changing probabilistic future quantum by quantum, moment by moment? Could wave particle duality be forming an interactive process with Light and matter in the form of electrons being waves over a ‘period of time’ with particle characteristics as a probabilistic ∆×∆pᵪ≥h/4π future unfolds?
@anthonymuller1376
Malcom bendalls pau model is revolutionary its inly a solid unified field theory 😮
@johndoyle2347
From dividing the e-th root of e (the weak force) by 1/e, to the e-th power (the strong force), creating Doyle's constant, to the various integrated forms of the photon and the formulation (Big Bang event) to using the Chain Rule to see the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, mathematically: What most people call the Sylvester's Linking Fan - a mechanical angle trisector relating to my "bellows method" that uses circles - is actually a type of integration. What makes the circles in my "bellows method" stay in place? The Bell curve, which connects to pi being produced by the ratio of the length from the origin to the centers of the compressed circles and the uncompressed. As I have already explained the integrations of Doyle's constant, Doyle's reduced constant, and Doyle's exchange constant - "from c to shining c to the 4th power", let's start with this: the Doyle's exchange constant formulation correlating to a Big Bang and the Archimedean spiral - negative e squared divided by (e to the i times θ power + 1/e to the i times θ power). This negative formulation for Doyle's exchange constant divided by the negative Doyle's exchange constant gets into laminar flow and how gravity from primordial black holes can be repulsive (gravitational waves) during a Big Bang event. (This is reminiscent of sine and cosine differentiations and integrations.) (It also describes photons that are about to be superheterodyned.) Further divide, like with the Chain Rule, by Doyle's reduced constant. Then divide by Doyle's constant. (The three forms of Doyle's constant, when considered together, get to the heart of combinatorics. I built a periscope, back in 1985, and want to design a new one that can use a fiber-optic cable, without being powered.) You get: the square root of (e + 1/e) + the square root of (e + 1/e) divided by e squared all divided by e to the (e + 1/e) power and divided by (e to the i times θ power + 1/e to the i times θ power). The strong and weak forces, expressed in the numerator, as being not enough to stop the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation. The Inflationary Epoch treated mathematically as a microscope for seeing microwave radiation! When matter falls into a black hole, its information is compressed to what can be stored in terms of the weak and strong forces. During a Big Bang event, matter has its information similarly compressed. Screw Kip Thorne! Weak force for singularities: the e-th root of e. Ambiguities. Weak force for entire stable particle: the union of the Ceva and Delanges sectrices. (Archimedean spiral e to the e-th power connection.) Strong force for singularities: 1/e, to the e-th power. Dualities. Strong force for entire stable particle: the union of the Delanges and Maclaurin sectrices. (Dinostratus quadratrix e + 1/e connection.) A singularity "wants" to form. The Ceva sectrix. Weak and strong forces "want" to stay divided. The Delanges sectrix "comes along" and "demands" that things pair up nicely or at least try to form a circle. The Maclaurin sectrix applies a Bell curve "clamp" to smoothen things out. (I'm like Jed Clampett, looking from the viewpoints of SSA elliptical and SSS hyperbolic mathematics, instead of a curbstone. I am also an expert mathematical marksman.) Can you see that the e-th root part is like a vertical asymptote and equilibrium expressed in the Ceva sectrix? Elliptical singularities? Can you see that the 1/e part is like a vertical tangent and half of the Delanges sectrix? Paired corner/cusp singularities? Matrix mathematics and partial derivatives of the weak and strong forces from sectrices, Doyle's constant style. Why no vertical line/dual numbers tensor? The Bell curve handles that singularity smoothing. You may also consider the 1 in the numerator of 1/e, here, to be the Bell curve, always incorporated into the strong force. The square root of (e + 1/e) divided by (e, cubed), is the constant of integration for the speed of light, and is the basis for our hindsight abilities. It helps explain time dilations. From comparing the mathematics when dropping the base from Doyle's constant to ignore strong force considerations and dimensionally expand the weak force, so as to understand the elliptical mathematics (SSA), viewed from polar equations of trisectrices. I have talked about mathematically proving the Riemann hypothesis in terms of Big Bounce physics. I talked about using absolute values to treat complex numbers like a 1, adding to the 1 of split-complex numbers to understand the amplification of gravitational aspects of singularities to get to 2nd degree dual numbers contact - almost like stacked pancakes. When black holes are broken in a Big Crunch, leaving mediants, you lose all stability considerations in three spatial dimensions and effectively go back to negative 1 with the formation of dark matter. This constant of integration was what I was using. By multiplying the constant of integration for the speed of light to my CMBR equation, I am able to see inside the bonds of atomic nuclei: (e, squared + 1), squared, divided by e to the 6th power, divided by e to the (e + 1/e) power, and divided by (e to the i times θ power + 1/e to the i times θ power). (e to the 6th power is an important limit of spacetime for particle stability.) "e to the 9th power": from a further multiplication of the constant of integration for the speed of light, for a second derivative. This mathematics gets into thicker singularities being allowed in superheterodyned photons and in aromatic resonance. The Delanges sectrix "demands" a pairing or ellipse of some sort, here. Surface tension also relates. Using your closed thumb and index finger to overcome nearsightedness gets into this mathematics, with a virtual image duality and an amplification of the weak force creating a lensing effect. Note: (e, cubed) times (pi to the 4th power + pi to the 5th power) = e to the 9th power, reminiscent of a Pythagorean triple. "e to the 12th power": from yet another multiplication of the constant of integration for the speed of light, for a third derivative. This mathematics gets into the end of laminar flow for the Inflationary Epoch, blood flow between systolic and diastolic pressures, and relates to the Dinostratus quadratrix. It is the limit of angular momentum and tilting angle before dark matter is forced to break from impact. Willans' Formula for primes and the breaking up of dark matter with respect to plus or minus e squared over (e + 1/e) and galactic/stellar origins and primordial black hole origins, respectively - from the Chain Rule, to the third derivative.
@kostar500
Somethings do not exist eternally, like dreams in our mind. Once we wake up, it is over. But it does not mean it did not happen or it is not real.
@vacaloca5575
Space cannot emerge because because there cannot be more of it, since it is provably infinite.
@gslimm40
If time didn't exist we wouldn't age
@vanikaghajanyan7760
25:12 Instead of general covariance, we should introduce the universal principle of relativity: the laws of physics are the same not only in their own and relative (inertial and non-inertial) reference frames, but also in their states (rest, stationary and non-stationary*) in their own and all sorts of relative reference frames. That is, the laws of physics can be invariantly-universal** only if they contain an element of improvisation and variation. —----------- *) - “The objective is to establish a theory based on the principle of equivalence for the case of inhomogeneous gravitational fields: already Einstein and Abraham tried to characterize the total static gravitational field by the value of the speed of light c at each point in space-time, which would thus play the role of the gravitational potential, and they looked for differential equations that the speed c must satisfy. But even if we set aside the fact that these theories take into account only gravitational fields of a special kind, they had already led to difficulties.” (Pauli, RT). **) - The equations that formulate the laws of physics should be invariant with respect to any coordinate transformations: "Equality" and "the same flow of processes" are not analogous concepts: and the word "relativity" itself contributed to the confusion of the concepts of "relative motion" and "relativism of phenomena". The relativity of motion determines the immutability of laws: the ambiguity of the word "relativity", when the content changes depending on whether it is applied to motion or to the formulation of physical laws, caused many errors." (Tonnela, Updating the concept of relativity in Einstein's physics). P.S.When Einstein noted: "God does not play dice," Bohr pointed out: "One should not tell God how to rule the world." However, Einstein apparently meant that there is no randomness for bones in their proper frame of reference.
@James1787Madison
He is only 70 years old. What's with his health?
@System_47
Physicists will never figure it out!!! Dimensional Memorandum has already corrected all of physics’ mistakes.
@alex79suited