@TDreads

It has been brought to my attention that the graffiti in ruin says "ostrich". In my defense, I did not make that up for the theory. I actually thought it said David since the game came out. HOWEVER, since David climbs out of the closet at the end of the game where the foxy plush will later be positioned, I'm DOUBLING DOWN 🗣️🔥 GOD DAVID

@AstralSpiff

I love the game series called Five Davids during One Night at Mimic's

@skitty101

The moment I saw David Mimic come out of the closet in Crying Child's room, the exact words of my mouth were "we should have let MatPat cook."

@brickowls7886

Two of the kids being called Dave and David is hilarious when you realize David was born first, so William probably copied Edwin's son's name while trying to steal everything else Edwin created

@Boigboi88

FNAF has now become the "Oops, All David" meme

@reorseX

Gregory preferred to go into the mall with all the killer robots alone than to sit for one more minute with the therapist woman.

@ToastyArmadio

THE MIMIC DAVID LITERALLY COMES OUT OF THE SAME CLOSET THAT NIGHTMARE FOXY HIDES IN THERE'S EVEN MORE CONNECTIONS TO FOXY DAMN IT

@mrbartinio

"I want another David"

@HoneyBeeHB

Having to put a disclaimer that you don’t think people with coping mechanisms are robots is really funny lmao

@orbenabu2279

7:01
Important detail: Edwin Murray refused to created any sport themed mascots/characters. It feels like important detail now about why Gregory doesn't have any information or opinion about sport in general.

@Thejammann42

This means that William not only stole Edwin's business, house, and designs but also his kids name and entire personality and maybe even his wife

Bro was so jealous my god

@GippyHappy

Fnaf lore was so complicated, how nice of the writers to do literally nothing to simplify it and in fact add further to the convolution with each release.

@Klondike_Bar28

yeah, never understood why matpats theory was so looked down upon. he was completely right in saying that the clothes MATTER in fnaf. there is no way scott with a full fledged out lore just makes a new game with a kid wearing exactly what the crying child wore for no reason. it was a valid point to take, and the whole point in theories is to use all the proof you have to link stuff together, and clothing was the only proof we had at the time. valid theory whether its right or wrong in the end

@novastein9567

Buff MatPat did it again, holy shit. And the worst/best thing: this feels totally on brand for FNAF

@evawiens8043

The fact that Gregory has yellow-ish eyes. If only there was a robot with yellow glowing eyes đź‘€

@jerms99

“Oh right this is TDreads audience; they need visual stimulation” damn cooked me

@laytonpro8655

Oh no. 
“The baby isn’t mine” 
“the BABY ISNT MINE”
Everyone thought this was about Michael, which never made sense to me because of the likeness between them but if he turned crying child Dave into David Murray that would make so much more sense. And the blonde lady in the cartoon looks like the commercial representation of Fiona. Her baby isn’t aftons it’s Edwin’s

@doltishiowa8577

One thing that I don’t see compared a lot is how moon.exe and FNAF world are very similar. Both present themselves as just a game, but are important to putting the pieces back together. Both games require you to follow a glitchy entity in order to put together the pieces of a broken soul back together. And another thing that both games do is state that the player was made to fix the broken souls. Moon.exe states that you are the sun and moon and will fix David, while glitch bear states that you where made to put the pieces back together for presumably the crying child. I’m not sure how this works in the story of FNAF, but I find these connections are interesting enough to put into consideration.

@tomjames9681

That god damn bingo card was less of a prediction and more of a warning.

@SaxophoneMan911

G O D  D A V I D